| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
< PRODIGY NEWS ~ August 4th: More Music for the Jilted Generation |
|||
|
|||
 Moderator Posts: 1980Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:27 am
|
Top notch fella.
No realy new insight, but still a good read to remind people of where they came from at the start. 
|
||
| Top |
 
|
||
|
|||
 Major Posts: 732Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 10:19 am
|
Yeah, thanks for it.
|
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
 GeneralPosts: 2220Location: DenmarkJoined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 2:55 pm
|
Nice read Invaders Must Die. Thanks man
|
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
 Grunt Posts: 60Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 12:16 pm
|
think you'd have to be a mug to buy this..
remastered by whom? I doubt prodge will see a penny of sales from this |
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
 GeneralPosts: 2861Location: Bristol, UKJoined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:58 pm
|
a mug to buy this? i think most people here have got it. the quality of the tracks are better and speedway and the heat have been altered to how they were meant to be, like where one track ends and the next begins. plus its worth buying just for the 05 version of break and enter alone.
it was remastered by kevin metcalfe in april 2007 (i can read the inside of the case  )
|
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
 GeneralPosts: 1967Location: UKJoined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 3:28 pm
|
MaxDamagus wrote: think you'd have to be a mug to buy this..
remastered by whom? I doubt prodge will see a penny of sales from this of course they will see money from it the prodigy own the tracks not XL the tracks are only licensed to XL so they will see royaltys from it |
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
 GeneralPosts: 3702Location: Almere, The NetherlandsJoined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 9:54 pm
|
MaxDamagus wrote: think you'd have to be a mug to buy this..
remastered by whom? I doubt prodge will see a penny of sales from this Of course they will... Liam Howlett wrote everything. And Maxim wrote on Poison too right ? So they'll definitely get their quids. |
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
 Lieutenant Posts: 581Location: Philly, USAJoined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 7:36 am
|
Quote: 09 Voodoo People (Dust Brothers Remix) (Remastered)
Why did they still label it as Dust Brothers Remix when even the 1995 7 track Voodoo People single had it listed as Chemical Brothers Remix.  Dust Brothers never did a remix The Chemical Brothers just used to call themselves that before they were told to change their name by the originals. Which led them to change their name in 1995. That's why the 94 4 track says Dust Brothers but not the 95 one. Did no one really notice this mistake when they were making this remastered edition?
|
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
 GeneralPosts: 2487Location: NorwayJoined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 5:27 pm
|
Warning wrote: Quote: 09 Voodoo People (Dust Brothers Remix) (Remastered) Why did they still label it as Dust Brothers Remix when even the 1995 7 track Voodoo People single had it listed as Chemical Brothers Remix. Dust Brothers never did a remix The Chemical Brothers just used to call themselves that before they were told to change their name by the originals. Which led them to change their name in 1995. That's why the 94 4 track says Dust Brothers but not the 95 one. Did no one really notice this mistake when they were making this remastered edition?Because there a slight difference beetween those two. The chemical one on the US voodoo ep, has a sample reversed in it. Cause they didnt actually have the right to use it then.+ |
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
| LieutenantPosts: 581Location: Philly, USAJoined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 7:36 am
|
HAHA just listened to my 94 one yeah I always wondered why that one part was in reverse just thought it was something weird the wanted to do. I never really listen to it because why when the other one has 7 tracks you know.
Quote: The British release included a remix by the The Chemical Brothers who at that time called themselves "The Dust Brothers" in honor of an American producer duo of the same name. When "Voodoo People" was to be released in the States, and due to the British Dust Brothers' rising popularity, the American Dust Brothers threatened a lawsuit if they didn't change their name. The British duo changed their name to "The Chemical Brothers", and the remix on the American Mute release was renamed in accordance. A small sample in the remix was also reversed on the American release due to copyright issues.
So it still shouldn't be called Dust Bothers Remix now when their really the Chemical Brothers and have been for years. They didn't call the 95 one Chemical Brothers remix because of the legal issue with the sample but for the real Dust Brothers threatening to sue them. |
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
 Prodigious ArabPosts: 4204Location: The Dark SideJoined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 5:22 pm
|
Prodigy More Music For the Jilted Generation
Quote: What they said: "'Poison' is our favourite track on the first two albums. Things were getting faster and faster and we were flipping it back and dropping it right back down to a hip hop tempo. It still had the heaviness and the toughness though. It had a great video as well. Everything was right about that track. It wasn't a massive hit but it was . . . proper. We realised a lot of things about ourselves around that time." Liam Howlett
What we say: "By the time Music For The Jilted Generation came out, the Criminal Justice Bill had illegalised ecstatic, communal music. Jilted... was also a fuck you, though, to those who had blamed the chart-topping Prodigy for the death of rave. Yes it crossed over. It fucking transcended" Melissa Bradshaw http://thequietus.com/articles/00853-th ... -14-to-one |
||
| Top |
|
||
All times are UTC
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests
| You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Original 2.x design by Mike Lothar // Ported to 3.x by CiC and will_hough
Original 2.x design by Mike Lothar // Ported to 3.x by CiC and will_hough