Author Message

<  PRODIGY MUSIC / GENERAL  ~  why it took so long for IMD to leak

PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:34 am
User avatarGeneralGeneralPosts: 1780Location: EnglandJoined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 8:06 pm
Kubazz wrote:
one man from polish forum has the promo and says that it IS watermarked and its why he's not leaking.

Image


Seeing the image, imagining the sweet sounds :cry: ...



_________________
Read my book Soulless Voodoo Guy
Like Soulless Voodoo Guy on Facebook
YouTube channel
Offline Profile
PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:39 am
User avatarModeratorModeratorPosts: 2212Location: Oslo, NorwayJoined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 12:48 pm
Chaosu wrote:
Wired Magazine wrote:
A number identifying every unique music file sold worldwide could be added using Activated Content's watermark, which crams 4 bits of watermarked data into each second of a compressed music file. If one were to play a song over speakers and rerecord it, those bits would remain intact, according to Hill.


Bullshit, impossible!
It would be posible if each promo would have audible changes like adding few dbs to a certain layer of the track, but in case of modified bits it all gets deformed via speakers.


so let me get this straight:

you're saying that Activated Content CTO Evan Hill is lying, and that Universal and Sony/BMG are paying for a product that doesn't work?

I mean, the fucking Fraunhofer Institute has published papers on this! ... a research organization with over 12,000 scientists and engineers would lie about their results?!

Audio Watermarking of MPEG-2 AAC Bit Streams

Man, stop smoking whatever it is you're smoking![/url]



_________________
Let's jet out, we'll cruise at hyperspeed!
Offline Profile WWW
PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:46 am
User avatarGeneralGeneralPosts: 6933Location: Scotland UKJoined: Wed May 23, 2007 2:57 pm
i've studied this a bit, but im sure if you put a filter through it or had it record without certain frequences (the freqences of the watermark data) they would not get recorded through, but figuring out the right frequency is bound to take a Long Long Time



_________________
"THERE WILL BE NO RETURNS"
Offline Profile WWW
PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 1:02 am
User avatarModeratorModeratorPosts: 2212Location: Oslo, NorwayJoined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 12:48 pm
Cogglesz wrote:
i've studied this a bit, but im sure if you put a filter through it or had it record without certain frequences (the freqences of the watermark data) they would not get recorded through, but figuring out the right frequency is bound to take a Long Long Time


now you just need to get your hands on the promo and do it!

:twisted:



_________________
Let's jet out, we'll cruise at hyperspeed!
Offline Profile WWW
PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 7:58 am
User avatarGeneralGeneralPosts: 2107Location: Berlin, GermanyJoined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 8:53 pm
... naah . There are hidden individual subliminal verses played backwards in the background on each track which said: "This promo was given to XXX who lives in XXX and now he´s fucked !" :lol:

I guess, it would work with cassettes and mini-discs but who cares about it, if the person pre-oredered the album.

I just wanna have one of those promos just to have a unique physical piece for my collection.... that´s it.



_________________
AS I ROLL WITH THE PRODIGY
Offline Profile WWW
PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 11:35 am
User avatarModeratorModeratorPosts: 1980Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:27 am
Flachcracker wrote:
I just wanna have one of those promos just to have a unique physical piece for my collection.... that´s it.


I'm with you on that. It looks freaking awesome for something so simple !! 8-)



_________________
fuck 'em and their law
Offline Profile
PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:19 pm
User avatarPrivatePrivatePosts: 239Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 8:51 pm
Hahahaha! The CD has been watermarked for a reason! To stop impatient shits like yourselves from spreading it about. Just be patient for fuck sake, there's not that long to wait!


Offline Profile
PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:26 pm
User avatarGeneralGeneralPosts: 1007Location: Atomic WastelandJoined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 9:26 am
that's kind a cool that album isn't floating anywhere :lol:

watermark - new weapon for leaking?



_________________
NASTY! NASTY!
Offline Profile
PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 1:05 pm
SergeantSergeantPosts: 478Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 9:38 am
crazyboy wrote:
Chaosu wrote:
Wired Magazine wrote:
A number identifying every unique music file sold worldwide could be added using Activated Content's watermark, which crams 4 bits of watermarked data into each second of a compressed music file. If one were to play a song over speakers and rerecord it, those bits would remain intact, according to Hill.


Bullshit, impossible!
It would be posible if each promo would have audible changes like adding few dbs to a certain layer of the track, but in case of modified bits it all gets deformed via speakers.


so let me get this straight:

you're saying that Activated Content CTO Evan Hill is lying, and that Universal and Sony/BMG are paying for a product that doesn't work?

I mean, the fucking Fraunhofer Institute has published papers on this! ... a research organization with over 12,000 scientists and engineers would lie about their results?!

Audio Watermarking of MPEG-2 AAC Bit Streams

Man, stop smoking whatever it is you're smoking![/url]


Nope man, he's right. What do you think how these bits will transport, telepathy???

If the arses of Universal and wtf tell you this system is unfailable, why do you think they do?

You have to understand when somebody is manipulating you, dude.

It might even be enoug to alter small things in the bit structure of the song, like speeding it up 0.1%, so you change the entire table of bits but keep the song intact enough to not loose listening pleasure.

Let me dudes tell you one very important thing: The war of copiers against distributers was over since the invention of mp3, the arrival of fast web-connection and the first version of napster and it will never be changed, only (-if, at all-) mader harder for copiers, spreaders aso.
As long as you can hear a signal, you will always have some sort of possibility to hijack it, wheter it's coded or whatnot, the rest is just trying to disguise / loose / disable the 'spyware' in it.

So, the album WILL leak, if it's gonna be done by a smart person or an idiot than can be traced - we'll see.


Offline Profile
PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 1:20 pm
User avatarGeneralGeneralPosts: 2924Location: italyJoined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 3:44 pm
guys,sorry about my ignorance,but what does watermark means? :oops: :oops: :oops:



_________________
https://soundcloud.com/the-spyral

www.myspace.com/thespyral
Offline Profile WWW
PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 1:23 pm
nucleartitan wrote:
guys,sorry about my ignorance,but what does watermark means? :oops: :oops: :oops:

a water mark is something that u can identify and doesnt affect the product

example in photos (see my copyright notice and myspace link?)

Image

in audio it can be bits of audio a human cant detect or a voice over the tracks saying something like "new record coming out in xxxxxxx".


PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 1:36 pm
GeneralGeneralPosts: 1769Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 11:09 am
Theres some good ideas here..
I just read this:
http://www.cmlab.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~dynam ... index.html


What about looking into which watermarking method they use?

Rip a wav file.
add another watermark on top.
Change speed with +0,75%
D/A A/D conversion
Add one more watermark
Change speed with -1% (may be useless or do harm as the new track will be only 0,25% from the original)
Re-encode to MP3

Should be possible to break the threshold? Anyone got a watermarking program to test with? Preferably 2 different programs, so that we can see how it reacts if we do not add a watermark of the same type as used originally.



_________________
http://www.theprodigy.dk/
Offline Profile
PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 1:39 pm
User avatarModeratorModeratorPosts: 2212Location: Oslo, NorwayJoined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 12:48 pm
Ekko wrote:
Nope man, he's right. What do you think how these bits will transport, telepathy???

If the arses of Universal and wtf tell you this system is unfailable, why do you think they do?

You have to understand when somebody is manipulating you, dude.

It might even be enoug to alter small things in the bit structure of the song, like speeding it up 0.1%, so you change the entire table of bits but keep the song intact enough to not loose listening pleasure.

Let me dudes tell you one very important thing: The war of copiers against distributers was over since the invention of mp3, the arrival of fast web-connection and the first version of napster and it will never be changed, only (-if, at all-) mader harder for copiers, spreaders aso.
As long as you can hear a signal, you will always have some sort of possibility to hijack it, wheter it's coded or whatnot, the rest is just trying to disguise / loose / disable the 'spyware' in it.

So, the album WILL leak, if it's gonna be done by a smart person or an idiot than can be traced - we'll see.


I'm not saying the system can't fail, or that the album won't leak. I'm saying that if you play the promo on your stereo and record it from the speakers, the watermark will still be intact and whatever record company can still identify what promo has been leaked. What Chaosu is saying is that such watermarking would not remain intact, iow that the boys at Activated Content are lying their asses off.

Though, I guess the only way to really find out is to actually do it. But I'd rather wait a couple of more weeks than to have a leak that was recorded through.



_________________
Let's jet out, we'll cruise at hyperspeed!
Offline Profile WWW
PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 2:13 pm
User avatarGeneralGeneralPosts: 2006Location: NorwayJoined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 4:50 pm
Cabalist wrote:
Hahahaha! The CD has been watermarked for a reason! To stop impatient shits like yourselves from spreading it about. Just be patient for fuck sake, there's not that long to wait!


Word!

It's a sad news for computernerds who grown up with pirate stuff of everything..

I love it! :twisted:



_________________
http://www.youtube.com/user/FrodeFalch

www.soundcloud.com/MoozeBlaster
Offline Profile WWW
PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 2:16 pm
User avatarGeneralGeneralPosts: 1296Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 9:49 am
In other words - we need a Pole who knows his shit. .


Offline Profile

Display posts from previous:  Sort by:

All times are UTC
Page 2 of 14
196 posts
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 14  Next
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests
Search for:
Post new topic  Reply to topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum