Author |
Message |
|
Otis P Jivefunk
|
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:34 am |
|
|
General Posts: 1780Location: EnglandJoined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 8:06 pm
|
Kubazz wrote: one man from polish forum has the promo and says that it IS watermarked and its why he's not leaking. 
Seeing the image, imagining the sweet sounds  ...
|
Top
|
|
crazyboy
|
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:39 am |
|
|
Moderator Posts: 2212Location: Oslo, NorwayJoined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 12:48 pm
|
Chaosu wrote: Wired Magazine wrote: A number identifying every unique music file sold worldwide could be added using Activated Content's watermark, which crams 4 bits of watermarked data into each second of a compressed music file. If one were to play a song over speakers and rerecord it, those bits would remain intact, according to Hill. Bullshit, impossible! It would be posible if each promo would have audible changes like adding few dbs to a certain layer of the track, but in case of modified bits it all gets deformed via speakers.
so let me get this straight:
you're saying that Activated Content CTO Evan Hill is lying, and that Universal and Sony/BMG are paying for a product that doesn't work?
I mean, the fucking Fraunhofer Institute has published papers on this! ... a research organization with over 12,000 scientists and engineers would lie about their results?!
Audio Watermarking of MPEG-2 AAC Bit Streams
Man, stop smoking whatever it is you're smoking![/url]
_________________ Let's jet out, we'll cruise at hyperspeed! |
|
Top
|
|
Cogglesz
|
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:46 am |
|
|
General Posts: 6933Location: Scotland UKJoined: Wed May 23, 2007 2:57 pm
|
i've studied this a bit, but im sure if you put a filter through it or had it record without certain frequences (the freqences of the watermark data) they would not get recorded through, but figuring out the right frequency is bound to take a Long Long Time
_________________ "THERE WILL BE NO RETURNS" |
|
Top
|
|
crazyboy
|
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 1:02 am |
|
|
Moderator Posts: 2212Location: Oslo, NorwayJoined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 12:48 pm
|
Cogglesz wrote: i've studied this a bit, but im sure if you put a filter through it or had it record without certain frequences (the freqences of the watermark data) they would not get recorded through, but figuring out the right frequency is bound to take a Long Long Time
now you just need to get your hands on the promo and do it!
_________________ Let's jet out, we'll cruise at hyperspeed! |
|
Top
|
|
Flachcracker
|
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 7:58 am |
|
|
General Posts: 2107Location: Berlin, GermanyJoined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 8:53 pm
|
... naah . There are hidden individual subliminal verses played backwards in the background on each track which said: "This promo was given to XXX who lives in XXX and now he´s fucked !"
I guess, it would work with cassettes and mini-discs but who cares about it, if the person pre-oredered the album.
I just wanna have one of those promos just to have a unique physical piece for my collection.... that´s it.
_________________ AS I ROLL WITH THE PRODIGY |
|
Top
|
|
rsshawn
|
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 11:35 am |
|
|
Moderator Posts: 1980Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:27 am
|
Flachcracker wrote: I just wanna have one of those promos just to have a unique physical piece for my collection.... that´s it.
I'm with you on that. It looks freaking awesome for something so simple !!
_________________ fuck 'em and their law |
|
Top
|
|
Cabalist
|
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:19 pm |
|
|
Private Posts: 239Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 8:51 pm
|
Hahahaha! The CD has been watermarked for a reason! To stop impatient shits like yourselves from spreading it about. Just be patient for fuck sake, there's not that long to wait!
|
Top
|
|
jilted
|
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:26 pm |
|
|
General Posts: 1007Location: Atomic WastelandJoined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 9:26 am
|
that's kind a cool that album isn't floating anywhere
watermark - new weapon for leaking?
_________________ NASTY! NASTY! |
|
Top
|
|
Ekko
|
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 1:05 pm |
|
|
Sergeant Posts: 478Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 9:38 am
|
crazyboy wrote: Chaosu wrote: Wired Magazine wrote: A number identifying every unique music file sold worldwide could be added using Activated Content's watermark, which crams 4 bits of watermarked data into each second of a compressed music file. If one were to play a song over speakers and rerecord it, those bits would remain intact, according to Hill. Bullshit, impossible! It would be posible if each promo would have audible changes like adding few dbs to a certain layer of the track, but in case of modified bits it all gets deformed via speakers. so let me get this straight: you're saying that Activated Content CTO Evan Hill is lying, and that Universal and Sony/BMG are paying for a product that doesn't work? I mean, the fucking Fraunhofer Institute has published papers on this! ... a research organization with over 12,000 scientists and engineers would lie about their results?! Audio Watermarking of MPEG-2 AAC Bit StreamsMan, stop smoking whatever it is you're smoking![/url]
Nope man, he's right. What do you think how these bits will transport, telepathy???
If the arses of Universal and wtf tell you this system is unfailable, why do you think they do?
You have to understand when somebody is manipulating you, dude.
It might even be enoug to alter small things in the bit structure of the song, like speeding it up 0.1%, so you change the entire table of bits but keep the song intact enough to not loose listening pleasure.
Let me dudes tell you one very important thing: The war of copiers against distributers was over since the invention of mp3, the arrival of fast web-connection and the first version of napster and it will never be changed, only (-if, at all-) mader harder for copiers, spreaders aso.
As long as you can hear a signal, you will always have some sort of possibility to hijack it, wheter it's coded or whatnot, the rest is just trying to disguise / loose / disable the 'spyware' in it.
So, the album WILL leak, if it's gonna be done by a smart person or an idiot than can be traced - we'll see.
|
Top
|
|
nucleartitan
|
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 1:20 pm |
|
|
General Posts: 2924Location: italyJoined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 3:44 pm
|
|
Top
|
|
Nuno
|
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 1:23 pm |
|
|
|
nucleartitan wrote:
a water mark is something that u can identify and doesnt affect the product
example in photos (see my copyright notice and myspace link?)
in audio it can be bits of audio a human cant detect or a voice over the tracks saying something like "new record coming out in xxxxxxx".
|
Top
|
|
s0ren
|
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 1:36 pm |
|
|
General Posts: 1769Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 11:09 am
|
Theres some good ideas here..
I just read this:
http://www.cmlab.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~dynam ... index.html
What about looking into which watermarking method they use?
Rip a wav file.
add another watermark on top.
Change speed with +0,75%
D/A A/D conversion
Add one more watermark
Change speed with -1% (may be useless or do harm as the new track will be only 0,25% from the original)
Re-encode to MP3
Should be possible to break the threshold? Anyone got a watermarking program to test with? Preferably 2 different programs, so that we can see how it reacts if we do not add a watermark of the same type as used originally.
|
Top
|
|
crazyboy
|
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 1:39 pm |
|
|
Moderator Posts: 2212Location: Oslo, NorwayJoined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 12:48 pm
|
Ekko wrote: Nope man, he's right. What do you think how these bits will transport, telepathy???
If the arses of Universal and wtf tell you this system is unfailable, why do you think they do?
You have to understand when somebody is manipulating you, dude.
It might even be enoug to alter small things in the bit structure of the song, like speeding it up 0.1%, so you change the entire table of bits but keep the song intact enough to not loose listening pleasure.
Let me dudes tell you one very important thing: The war of copiers against distributers was over since the invention of mp3, the arrival of fast web-connection and the first version of napster and it will never be changed, only (-if, at all-) mader harder for copiers, spreaders aso. As long as you can hear a signal, you will always have some sort of possibility to hijack it, wheter it's coded or whatnot, the rest is just trying to disguise / loose / disable the 'spyware' in it.
So, the album WILL leak, if it's gonna be done by a smart person or an idiot than can be traced - we'll see.
I'm not saying the system can't fail, or that the album won't leak. I'm saying that if you play the promo on your stereo and record it from the speakers, the watermark will still be intact and whatever record company can still identify what promo has been leaked. What Chaosu is saying is that such watermarking would not remain intact, iow that the boys at Activated Content are lying their asses off.
Though, I guess the only way to really find out is to actually do it. But I'd rather wait a couple of more weeks than to have a leak that was recorded through.
_________________ Let's jet out, we'll cruise at hyperspeed! |
|
Top
|
|
MoozeBlaster
|
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 2:13 pm |
|
|
General Posts: 2006Location: NorwayJoined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 4:50 pm
|
Cabalist wrote: Hahahaha! The CD has been watermarked for a reason! To stop impatient shits like yourselves from spreading it about. Just be patient for fuck sake, there's not that long to wait!
Word!
It's a sad news for computernerds who grown up with pirate stuff of everything..
I love it!
|
Top
|
|
ChemicaL
|
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 2:16 pm |
|
|
General Posts: 1296Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 9:49 am
|
In other words - we need a Pole who knows his shit. .
|
Top
|
|
|