| BRAINKILLER FORUM http://www.brainkiller.it/forum/ |
|
| IMD only 40 minutes long?!?!?! you got to be fucking kidding http://www.brainkiller.it/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=3941 |
Page 1 of 4 |
| Author: | De5EBticon [ Sat Jan 17, 2009 5:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | IMD only 40 minutes long?!?!?! you got to be fucking kidding |
according to this website the polish record company handling the release of IMD states that the album has 11 tracks and is only 40 minutes long!!!!!!!!! anyone who can read polish can confirm this , if that's the truth i am fucking disappointed 
http://www.empik.com/invaders-must-die- ... d6340002,p |
|
| Author: | Electronic_Punk® [ Sat Jan 17, 2009 5:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
43 minutes Topic moved |
|
| Author: | Otis P Jivefunk [ Sat Jan 17, 2009 5:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I think it works out to just over 44 and a half minutes, and then you've also got to add Omen Reprise time onto that, whatever that is... |
|
| Author: | Neuburger [ Sat Jan 17, 2009 5:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Dude, your reaction is a bit late. |
|
| Author: | De5EBticon [ Sat Jan 17, 2009 5:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
sorry ive been away for a while and i missed the previous post
|
|
| Author: | Laurie [ Sat Jan 17, 2009 6:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: IMD only 40 minutes long?!?!?! you got to be fucking kid |
De5EBticon wrote: according to this website the polish record company handling the release of IMD states that the album has 11 tracks and is only 40 minutes long!!!!!!!!! anyone who can read polish can confirm this , if that's the truth i am fucking disappointed
Dont worry mate, just because it's only around about 44 minutes doesn't mean that the album won't be as good. I'll use Chase and Status as an example. Tunes they made a couple years ago got boring after about half way imo (at around 3 mins). Then they released More Than Alot (average track length about 4 mins) and all the tunes sound exciting until the end. So what I'm saying is that maybe the tracks on IMD wouldn't be as good if they were around 6 mins each because they might get a tiny bit boring and not live up to their potential. |
|
| Author: | JimbQ [ Sat Jan 17, 2009 6:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: IMD only 40 minutes long?!?!?! you got to be fucking kid |
Laurie wrote: De5EBticon wrote: according to this website the polish record company handling the release of IMD states that the album has 11 tracks and is only 40 minutes long!!!!!!!!! anyone who can read polish can confirm this , if that's the truth i am fucking disappointed Dont worry mate, just because it's only around about 44 minutes doesn't mean that the album won't be as good. I'll use Chase and Status as an example. Tunes they made a couple years ago got boring after about half way imo (at around 3 mins). Then they released More Than Alot (average track length about 4 mins) and all the tunes sound exciting until the end. So what I'm saying is that maybe the tracks on IMD wouldn't be as good if they were around 6 mins each because they might get a tiny bit boring and not live up to their potential. Thats exactly what I think. Thanks for saving me the hastle of typing that all out 
|
|
| Author: | Aesop Real [ Sat Jan 17, 2009 6:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Yeah, I'd rather have 43 minutes of crafted goodness than have a 80 minute CD full of shit. |
|
| Author: | dzudohonor [ Sat Jan 17, 2009 6:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
44 mins without Omen Reprise..so we have 46 mins at least - 7 mins less than FOTL? |
|
| Author: | MoozeBlaster [ Sat Jan 17, 2009 6:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Aesop Real wrote: Yeah, I'd rather have 43 minutes of crafted goodness than have a 80 minute CD full of shit.
Since when did Liam do anything close to "shit"? 
|
|
| Author: | Aesop Real [ Sat Jan 17, 2009 7:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
MoozeBlaster wrote: Aesop Real wrote: Yeah, I'd rather have 43 minutes of crafted goodness than have a 80 minute CD full of shit. Since when did Liam do anything close to "shit"? Hahaha, of course I don't mean Liam. |
|
| Author: | MoozeBlaster [ Sat Jan 17, 2009 7:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
thats my point. Since its Liam and the Prodigy, there is no good arguments for a short album vs a long one |
|
| Author: | Aesop Real [ Sat Jan 17, 2009 7:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
MoozeBlaster wrote: thats my point. Since its Liam and the Prodigy, there is no good arguments for a short album vs a long one
Yeah I mean, of course I compare it to other artists that will shit out a 80 minute CD and it sucks. It would have been cool if it was the size of Music for the Jilted but if this is what he meant for this album to be, than it's good enough for me. The size does not matter to me, the quality of the tracks do. |
|
| Author: | Stuie [ Sat Jan 17, 2009 7:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
How many artists out there lately actually fill up a cd with 80 mins worth of tracks?? I can't think of any at all, we were spoiled with MFTJG going almost 79 mins bearing in mind that was 15 years ago but thats not gonna happen again. Tracks nowadays need to be straight to the point and no filler. Its the generation we live in, everyone wants everything yesterday. Case in point that 80% of the people on BK want to hear the album before the release date. Have the fucking patience!!!! We have 37 days to go before we're gonna hear potentially the best material LH has ever produced and if i have to wait 37 days to hear 44 mins of material, i would gladly do it. Edit: And another thing, if people do complain that tracks are too short, there's a program called Audacity, i'd advice people to use it and lengthen or shorten any part of any track they want to suit their tastes. I won't because i will not mess with perfection. RANT OVER! 
|
|
| Author: | Guest01 [ Sat Jan 17, 2009 8:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Interesting that WOF on this boxset vinyl is 04:50. But we all know that Cd version is 05:29. |
|
| Page 1 of 4 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|