Author Message

<  MOVIES & DVD  ~  Mad Max remake

PostPosted: Fri May 22, 2015 10:18 pm
User avatarGeneralGeneralPosts: 1356Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 10:26 pm
Just came from the cinema. It is a good movie but defenately the reviews exaggerate. No character development and although it might sound weird....the action does not stop even for a min.Well it stops a couple of times but 80% you ll get a headache.It is like a remake of the 2nd Mad max.The old one is better.

*Charlize with that army haircut is hotter than the flames of hell.



_________________
.: Electronic_PunkĀ®'s lovechild :.
Offline Profile
PostPosted: Sat May 23, 2015 1:51 pm
User avatarGeneralGeneralPosts: 2427Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 9:33 pm
A disagree with you, and agree with all reviews. Everything in this movie is just fantastic. It is movie of the year so far, and one of best movies in last 10 years.

Masterpiece 10/10


(and this is not remake)



_________________
Censoring your own song is like sucking your own dick...
Offline Profile
PostPosted: Sun May 24, 2015 4:03 pm
GeneralGeneralPosts: 1947Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 1:16 pm
Not a remake, picks up after Beyond Thunderdome. (It was gonna star Mel Gibson prior to all his problems with alcohol and etc...)



One of the best (and most pure) action films ever made.
Better than Road Warrior and Terminator 2. Believe the hype.



"no character development" lol. All the lead characters have their story arcs and even minor characters like the "Dag" get tiny arcs amidst all the action. [young woman gets inspired into pursuing botanism by an old biker lady who is also really good with guns. Amaze. X) ]

Fucking relentless.. the film equivalent of a good Prodigy gig. :lol: 8-)


Offline Profile
PostPosted: Sun May 24, 2015 8:24 pm
User avatarGeneralGeneralPosts: 1356Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 10:26 pm
How it is not a remake? Max from the 3rd film was older than Max on this one.He even has grey hair on thunderdome.
Might had been written for a sequel but since Mel could not deliver...

I did not say that it is not a good film.It is but there is no character developement.To be honest i cared more for Furiosa than Max.I hope the sequel will find the right balance.Action all the time does not mean better.

From an article: ''George Miller refuses to call the film either a sequel or a reboot. He just calls the film a "revisiting".''

So...i'm not sure too...i still think it is a reboot or remake.Tom is too young compared to Mel on thunderdome for this to be a sequel.



_________________
.: Electronic_PunkĀ®'s lovechild :.
Offline Profile
PostPosted: Sun May 24, 2015 9:42 pm
User avatarGeneralGeneralPosts: 1967Location: UKJoined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 3:28 pm
it definatly is not a remake as it has references to the other films in it one of them being the wind up music box toy


Offline Profile
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2016 8:44 pm
User avatarGeneralGeneralPosts: 6542Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 9:44 am


_________________
You Just Run On Automation
Offline Profile

Display posts from previous:  Sort by:

All times are UTC
Page 1 of 1
6 posts
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests
Search for:
Post new topic  Reply to topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum