so much things I could reply to what you guys said, sad I'm a bit restricted in what I'm saying, I'm not as fluent in English as I am in French
anyway, I said I thought owning a gun is stupid, thats of course because of how I've been raised
(bokorugro) you said that how you've been raised you've been handling guns since you were 4, but I haven't been raised like this: my parents hadn't got a gun, I ain't got one, I've never even touched (a real) one, and in fact I don't think I know anybody who's got a gun
so that makes the context of the opinion a lot different
of course there isn't the same type of people here that there is somewhere else
here, where I live (in my little town), my mom does it but I don't care if I ain't locking my house's doors, my car's doors either, cause I've been in this house for 12 years, no one ever breaked and entered anything on my estate
it's been said a young woman could walk alone in the streets, the night, in Montréal (Québec's main metropolis), without any risks, which a similar woman couldn't do in a couple of metropolis of USA
so I'm asking myself, where is the need to protect myself with a gun after that? I just don't feel the need to be protected by a gun, chances I need to use it are so low, there is a lot more chance that an accident happen instead
I'm not saying everyone that gets themself a gun is irresponsible, but I think a situation like what happened here with the Texas guy is a lot more feasible
if the same situation happened to you, think about it very reasonably, do you really think that, in the pressure of the moment, everything you could do would be right? I think there is of course more chances of "oh shit! there's a thief in my house! ah, here's my gun! PANG! oh shit I killed him!" (even if you just wanted to freeze him), more than "hey you stop right now! - okay okay I'm sorry, what I done was bad"
I also think you don't propagate peace by giving the right to people to have a gun, just like you don't attract flies with vinegar
George W. Bush said he's a man of piece, but USA still is one of the biggest producers of guns in the world (if not the biggest)
if none of the men (the shooter or the stealers) had the right to own a gun, I don't think we'd be talking about these victims right now
maybe those victims didn't have guns, but I'm sure owning some (and the easiness to get a gun) helps in stealing for a lot of criminals
The Oracle wrote:
I mean, the entire planet has guns. You're more likely to be shot, hung, stoned, beheaded, suicide bombed, etc in another country than the US
prove me the first statement, and maybe you're right with the second but (for being killed in a simple manner) I wouldn't be surprised if USA is worse than the average (still to prove)
and finally:
bokorugro wrote:
do criminals have rights??????
so when does someone stop having rights? is it when someone does something very bad? well in the same direction of this statement (as I don't think act removes the rights from someone), I'd give honestly more rights to someone who just wanted to steal some non-living hardware, than to someone who did hurt life (whatever how filthy that one might was)
.I.M.O.
(very sorry If I was going a bit of topic some times, I just wanted to express my point of view on the stuff related to this)
don't take anything personal, too, btw, we're just chatting