| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
< PRODIGY MUSIC / GENERAL ~ I've never heard this before.. |
|||
|
|||
 Private Posts: 165Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 7:31 pm
|
|
||
| Top |
 
|
||
|
|||
| PrivatePosts: 191Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:58 am
|
Same here, how odd. Sure someone will explain it.
|
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
 Prodigious ArabPosts: 4204Location: The Dark SideJoined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 5:22 pm
|
Nice find!
|
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
 General Posts: 6541Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 9:44 am
|
Remember hearing about this at the time, though never released.
Nice one RENEGEDD Was for this album http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monsieur_G ... _Revisited
|
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
 GeneralPosts: 1113Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 2:05 am
|
nice find. so keith version didnt end up on the release
|
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
| GeneralPosts: 6541Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 9:44 am
|
UN wrote: nice find. so keith version didnt end up on the release Here's why  Quote: This was a version of "Les Sucettes" (The Lollipops), the song which naughty old Serge famously put in the demure teenage mouth of the debutante France Gall, and which was "revisited" by Keith Flint, of the Prodigy. A great track, apparently, with a wild string section playing the parts of all the instruments. So why was it shelved - the point about "Les Sucettes" was surely its lack of explicitness, the double entendre being in the ear of the listener? "Well, it was the licking noises that Keith put in," says Beauvallet. Flint's lascivious slurping, it appears, tipped the balance of probability too far away from the consumption of confectionery and the Ginsburg thumbs went down. Tant pis.
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-enter ... 74402.html
|
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
 ColonelPosts: 826Location: EnglandJoined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 3:20 pm
|
Had I not read the above then I'd have said FAKE
|
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
 A.K.A. feelxPosts: 3056Location: Montréal, QCJoined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 11:32 pm
|
Amazing! I still prefer the original, though.
For those who don't know about the song, Serge Gainsbourg wrote it for a naive young singer in her late teens, with a very implicit double entendre. She sings about getting herself a lollipop in exchange of a few pennies, and reaching paradise when the sugar flows down her throat. While the singer only thought of the literal meaning, the lyrics can, however, be turned around and interpreted as her offering blowjobs for a few pennies, and being very happy when you-know-what flows down her throat. Mind you, the way she pronounces "pennies" also make it sound like another word... See the original video, from 1966: http://youtu.be/q-iysdFu_TQ Antz wrote: Had I not read the above then I'd have said FAKE
yeah, same here
|
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
 GeneralPosts: 2220Location: DenmarkJoined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 2:55 pm
|
Wow crazy shit!
I can understand why it didn't end up on the album though...
|
||
| Top |
|
||
|
|||
 GeneralPosts: 3835Location: USAJoined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 6:56 pm
|
so now Keith is giving BJs for a few pennies in this version?
|
||
| Top |
|
||
All times are UTC
|
Page 1 of 1
10 posts |
|---|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests
| You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Original 2.x design by Mike Lothar // Ported to 3.x by CiC and will_hough
Original 2.x design by Mike Lothar // Ported to 3.x by CiC and will_hough